> The most straightforward way to incentivize is to simply reward the behavior that you want to promote.
I've seen first hand a child learn to read. By far their biggest incentive is the fact that written text appears literally everywhere (in a city environment). To them it's like unlocking a superpower. A monetary reward in comparison incentivizes passing the literacy test, it does not incentivize actually being able to read.
Right, there's a difference between intrinsic incentives and extrinsic incentives. With extrinsic incentives, you pay someone to do something you want them to. There is only so much performance you can get out of someone by paying them: if the task is mind numbingly boring, they will take more money for it but probably not increase proficiency beyond a certain point.
But with intrinsic incentives, there is no limit to what someone will do to get what they want. If it's learning, then they will self-direct their learning. They'll surpass other students and even the teacher. The problem with a lot of school is that we expect students to learn by incentivizing them extrinsically (threatening punishment if they fail, rewarding them if they succeed), but most of the subjects taught in school will never be used again and so there's no intrinsic motivation to learn them
Henrik Karlsson is a really awesome writer. His "writing a blog is a long, complicated search query" article actually got me into blogging (not that I'm any good yet, but that's the point!)
I had learned recently that (apparently) public schools Just came from a time when Rockefeller wanted more factory workers, so we took to training up the local populace.
I think my only main question on public schooling, is: why don't we teach kids how to survive? Kids on dysfunctional homes don't learn how to cook, look at nutrition labels, budget, learn how insurance works, learn how insulation works. Everything is just a black box to them. (Speaking from experience)
> The most straightforward way to incentivize is to simply reward the behavior that you want to promote.
I've seen first hand a child learn to read. By far their biggest incentive is the fact that written text appears literally everywhere (in a city environment). To them it's like unlocking a superpower. A monetary reward in comparison incentivizes passing the literacy test, it does not incentivize actually being able to read.
Right, there's a difference between intrinsic incentives and extrinsic incentives. With extrinsic incentives, you pay someone to do something you want them to. There is only so much performance you can get out of someone by paying them: if the task is mind numbingly boring, they will take more money for it but probably not increase proficiency beyond a certain point.
But with intrinsic incentives, there is no limit to what someone will do to get what they want. If it's learning, then they will self-direct their learning. They'll surpass other students and even the teacher. The problem with a lot of school is that we expect students to learn by incentivizing them extrinsically (threatening punishment if they fail, rewarding them if they succeed), but most of the subjects taught in school will never be used again and so there's no intrinsic motivation to learn them
Henrik Karlsson is a really awesome writer. His "writing a blog is a long, complicated search query" article actually got me into blogging (not that I'm any good yet, but that's the point!)
I had learned recently that (apparently) public schools Just came from a time when Rockefeller wanted more factory workers, so we took to training up the local populace.
I think my only main question on public schooling, is: why don't we teach kids how to survive? Kids on dysfunctional homes don't learn how to cook, look at nutrition labels, budget, learn how insurance works, learn how insulation works. Everything is just a black box to them. (Speaking from experience)