Dahlia Kurtz's Twitter feed (@DahliaKurtz) is a torrent of hate, abuse, disinformation and Islamophobia. Describing it as full of “racist, violent anti-Palestinian posts”, or Kurtz as a “genocide supporter” and “fascist”, is simple description of fact, and you can see that for yourself [0].
But being called a genocide supporter - which she clearly is - is grounds for arrest? Wtf Canada.
Canada and Europe have adopted insane anti- free speech laws censoring people for their ideas. This is where it leads... if you say something someone powerful does not like, you will be imprisoned.
Free speech is the most important requirement to have a real democracy.
> Approximately 3,500 people contacted police demanding the charges be dropped. In response to Engler’s article, police added new charges against him for allegedly intimidating and harassing investigator Crivello through his writing about the initial charges.
The logical conclusion of taking seriously "stochastic terrorism" - you are at fault for accurate statements that make people justifiably angry. Not to mention the vague "harassment" offense. Usually written as "threats & harassment", to make criminalizing it more palatable by conflating it with threats.
Dahlia Kurtz's Twitter feed (@DahliaKurtz) is a torrent of hate, abuse, disinformation and Islamophobia. Describing it as full of “racist, violent anti-Palestinian posts”, or Kurtz as a “genocide supporter” and “fascist”, is simple description of fact, and you can see that for yourself [0].
But being called a genocide supporter - which she clearly is - is grounds for arrest? Wtf Canada.
0 - https://x.com/search?q=from%3ADahliaKurtz%20genocide
Canada and Europe have adopted insane anti- free speech laws censoring people for their ideas. This is where it leads... if you say something someone powerful does not like, you will be imprisoned.
Free speech is the most important requirement to have a real democracy.
> Approximately 3,500 people contacted police demanding the charges be dropped. In response to Engler’s article, police added new charges against him for allegedly intimidating and harassing investigator Crivello through his writing about the initial charges.
The logical conclusion of taking seriously "stochastic terrorism" - you are at fault for accurate statements that make people justifiably angry. Not to mention the vague "harassment" offense. Usually written as "threats & harassment", to make criminalizing it more palatable by conflating it with threats.