I've made something (probably) very similar for quick GB vs US pronunciation check that also leeches on Google's snapshot of what I believe is a licensed copy of the Oxford collection the same way the shell script does, but mine "runs in browser's URL bar" instead. It's a super tiny dataURI HTML document, intended to be bookmarked with a keyword (say, "say"):
then hitting Tab plays it in British and Shift+Tab plays it in US English. It uses older 2016 batch, because I totally adore the US voice in it: just listen to "music" [1] and tell it isn't pure ASMR.
(I'm afraid it just a matter of time they will prevent our mischief, though.)
Ha ha, really glad to hear that. (The fact is, I am kinda freak/junkie about human voices, and that particular one stands really high on my list of irresistible tingles-inducing specimens. So happy to hear I am not alone.)
Have you found any you like in the AI world for text to speech? I know ElevenLabs and OpenAI have voices, but I'm hoping to build something that can be run locally.
English is not my first language, and I didn't realize it was "google say" at first, so I was sitting here scratching my head wondering how you could possibly pronounce this word. Interesting that it's a shell script and not so much a browser extension or something. I guess this is for when you're knee deep in terminals?
> I guess this is for when you're knee deep in terminals?
One can use it directly in terminal or it can be used as a dependency tool in other scripts similar to the way other UNIX tools are used. For example I use it as a pronunciation player in my dictionary dict-master [1]. It's a shell script too.
Another example (run two times so it uses the cache the second time):
echo this unix pipeline is poor man text to speech | xargs -n 1 gsay
I tried running the suggested code (curl -sL ...) but inadvertently did not check it was missing quotes around '\r'. So after a while I started seeing some errors:
[error] No valid link found according to patterns for 'aboad'
[error] No valid link found according to patterns for 'absob'
[error] No valid link found according to patterns for 'acoss'
I thought "well, there's quite a lot of words I need to learn in English", but after seeing 'addess' and 'adventue' I thought "wait, this is not ight".
Fixing it helps, but there are still missing expressions, such as "add up", "a couple", etc.
Thanks! Fixed that example. (In fish shell that I use, it didn't need those quotes that's why I didn't catch it)
>there are still missing expressions, such as "add up", "a couple", etc.
Googling "pronounce add up" does not show the google short answer box for me. Aside from that, the heuristic method I used may miss some words since it's not quite clear to me how the naming scheme works in that static stash. The 2024 stash is more straightforward but as I mentioned in readme, it sounds synthetic to me.
There is a website forvo.com which has a bunch of community-generated pronunciations of words in a ton of languages. I used to use it a lot when I was playing around w/ learning languages.
so many of the pronunciations I find on the web are just raw text-to-speech outputs that assume a generic pronunciation and fail for many words, in particular for names. I hope that the Google ones are actually human generated and verified, but am not confident of that.
I've made something (probably) very similar for quick GB vs US pronunciation check that also leeches on Google's snapshot of what I believe is a licensed copy of the Oxford collection the same way the shell script does, but mine "runs in browser's URL bar" instead. It's a super tiny dataURI HTML document, intended to be bookmarked with a keyword (say, "say"):
so when I do then hitting Tab plays it in British and Shift+Tab plays it in US English. It uses older 2016 batch, because I totally adore the US voice in it: just listen to "music" [1] and tell it isn't pure ASMR.(I'm afraid it just a matter of time they will prevent our mischief, though.)
[0] oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com uses the same collection. [1] https://ssl.gstatic.com/dictionary/static/sounds/20160317/mu...
Dubiously, I clicked. Yeah, I could listen to her read the dictionary as I waft off to sleep...
Ha ha, really glad to hear that. (The fact is, I am kinda freak/junkie about human voices, and that particular one stands really high on my list of irresistible tingles-inducing specimens. So happy to hear I am not alone.)
Have you found any you like in the AI world for text to speech? I know ElevenLabs and OpenAI have voices, but I'm hoping to build something that can be run locally.
Would be nice if there were enough words in a sentence with that voice to create an ai voice clone.
English is not my first language, and I didn't realize it was "google say" at first, so I was sitting here scratching my head wondering how you could possibly pronounce this word. Interesting that it's a shell script and not so much a browser extension or something. I guess this is for when you're knee deep in terminals?
> I guess this is for when you're knee deep in terminals?
One can use it directly in terminal or it can be used as a dependency tool in other scripts similar to the way other UNIX tools are used. For example I use it as a pronunciation player in my dictionary dict-master [1]. It's a shell script too.
Another example (run two times so it uses the cache the second time):
[1]: https://github.com/pvonmoradi/dict-masterI tried running the suggested code (curl -sL ...) but inadvertently did not check it was missing quotes around '\r'. So after a while I started seeing some errors:
[error] No valid link found according to patterns for 'aboad'
[error] No valid link found according to patterns for 'absob'
[error] No valid link found according to patterns for 'acoss'
I thought "well, there's quite a lot of words I need to learn in English", but after seeing 'addess' and 'adventue' I thought "wait, this is not ight".
Fixing it helps, but there are still missing expressions, such as "add up", "a couple", etc.
Thanks! Fixed that example. (In fish shell that I use, it didn't need those quotes that's why I didn't catch it)
>there are still missing expressions, such as "add up", "a couple", etc.
Googling "pronounce add up" does not show the google short answer box for me. Aside from that, the heuristic method I used may miss some words since it's not quite clear to me how the naming scheme works in that static stash. The 2024 stash is more straightforward but as I mentioned in readme, it sounds synthetic to me.
There is a website forvo.com which has a bunch of community-generated pronunciations of words in a ton of languages. I used to use it a lot when I was playing around w/ learning languages.
There's also a paid API. I made a very basic command-line client which might still work: https://github.com/erinok/forvosay
what is the source of google's pronunciations?
i've always held the cambridge learner dictionary's ones in high esteem.
e.g. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pronunci...
so many of the pronunciations I find on the web are just raw text-to-speech outputs that assume a generic pronunciation and fail for many words, in particular for names. I hope that the Google ones are actually human generated and verified, but am not confident of that.